By Rebecca St Fleur
Correspondent
Live Nation and its subsidiary Ticketmaster, a popular ticket sales site, illegally monopolized event markets and overcharged consumers, found a jury on Wednesday, April 15, according to The New York Times.
After four days of heavy deliberation, the federal antitrust trial ended with this decision. Ticketmaster is one of the largest ticket sellers in the United States live entertainment space, and a roadblock in their competitive practices could reshape the entire industry.
Live Nation and Ticketmaster merged together back in 2010 and since then, have continuously garnered criticism from both fans and artists alike for their handling of concert sales, most notably in Taylor Swift’s 2023 Eras Tour. Fans spent hours waiting in online queues just to look at the website and then it crashed, sending customers right back to the beginning of the time-consuming process.
In combination with Ticketmaster, Live Nation owns hundreds of venues and has deals with various artists on tour, while the subsidiary sold the tickets to those places, putting them in position to touch multiple aspects of the live entertainment industry.
“In 2024, the Justice Department, under the Biden administration, filed a lawsuit accusing Live Nation of unfairly wielding its power over concert promotion, artist management, venue operations and ticketing services to shut out competition in the industry. The DOJ contended that Ticketmaster controlled around 80% of concert ticketing in the primary marketplace, plus a growing share of the resale market. The District of Columbia and 39 states joined the government's case,” reported NPR.
While penalties have not yet been determined by the court, there are many factors that could still potentially undermine the verdict. A few days into the trial, the Department of Justice under President Donald Trump’s administration announced a tentative $280 million settlement with Live Nation. Critics thought the terms of the settlement were a mere slap on the wrist and more than 30 states were not moved by this agreement. The settlement would also need a federal judge’s approval and so the trial continued.
In damages, jurors found that “...Ticketmaster had overcharged customers $1.72 per ticket in 22 states, which a judge could order the company to pay back. That could cost Live Nation hundreds of millions of dollars,” stated AP News. The cost of these damages may add up to be a similar amount to the settlement the company entered.
But what does this verdict mean for consumers? As of now, not very much. Nothing will immediately change ticket prices or how they are sold. The court would have to order structural remedies such as behavioral restrictions, which is the next step in this trial. But Live Nation still can and plans to pursue motions and appeals, meaning the conclusion consumers are waiting for remains far in the future.
In a joint letter filed on Friday, April 24, Live Nation, the Justice Department and the states that initiated the lawsuit, released opposing schedules for the upcoming motions, beginning another battle.
“The filing is the major post‑verdict fight over whether the holdout states’ push for broader remedies — including a potential breakup of Live Nation and Ticketmaster — will move forward promptly or be forced to wait until after the DOJ’s more limited settlement has already been reviewed and potentially entered by the court,” according to TicketNews.
That distinction matters because the DOJ settlement does not require Live Nation to divest Ticketmaster. Instead, it relies on a package of conduct restrictions, ticketing‑access provisions, venue‑related obligations, a monitor, an eight‑year decree term, penalties for violations, and a roughly $280.4 million settlement fund,” Ticket News specified.
Judge Arun Subramanian has the final say on which of the different approaches will move forward. Depending on what he adopts, the ongoing fight could be delayed, which is exactly what Live Nation is seeking.
_02.jpg){kind=link}